Maximizing California’s Resources: Recommendations for a Stronger
Design and Construction Industry
Sacramento, CA- March 17, 2011 — In furthering past efforts to actively engage State Government in helping find ways to be more effective and efficient, The American Institute of Architects, California Council (AIACC) has published a whitepaper; Maximizing California’s Resources: Recommendations for a Stronger Design and Construction Industry. It presents a comprehensive vision which includes specific recommendations for building a stronger DSA, furthering the role and relevancy of the State Architect in California’s government. The whitepaper is intended to be a first-step toward assisting state government leaders in addressing the myriad of issues regarding planning, design, and construction affecting the quality of life for California’s citizens and its economy.
As a consequence of California’s current budget crisis, and the cuts the state is facing, which in turn will affect programs and services that benefit our communities, efficiency and effectiveness in the built environment has never been more important.
Architectural design has the inherent ability to solve problems that are physical, as well as social and economic. Without direct internal access to government decision makers, the AIACC cannot affect the transformations needed that ultimately effect the greater community at large. Transformations such as new delivery methods that are more efficient and cost effective, designs that go beyond sustainable, and post occupancy evaluation tools that impact future designs for better building performance, are key to our goal for a preferred future. Former State Architects, as well as architectural practitioners, involved in the development of this white paper, recently stated the value of its contents.
“The AIACC has shown responsible leadership in preparing this important, and much needed set of recommendations for maximizing effective utilization of the State’s design and construction resources for the benefit of California’s citizens.” Barry Wasserman, FAIA, Former California State Architect 1978 – 1983.
“I am pleased to endorse the efforts of the AIACC in producing this important white paper. The fragmentation of the State’s design and construction process over the years has increased costs to California taxpayers through over regulation and burdensome duplication of services. There is no single trusted advisor for the Governor, or the legislature, to acquire accurate advice for the industry. Now that the State of California is facing unprecedented infrastructure, budget and environmental issues, the time has come to consolidate design and construction into one entity and restore the Division of the State Architect to the role it held during the previous Brown Administration.” Paul Neel, FAIA, CDS, Former California State Architect 1989 – 1991.
“I applaud and support the AIACC’s efforts to strengthen and reinvigorate the role of the State Architect. Architecture, and its positive impact on society, reflects the values of our State. By restoring the role of the State Architect to one of leadership and prominence, we are expressing pride and an elevated standard for our public buildings and an optimistic outlook toward California’s future.” Steve Newsom, AIA, LEED AP.
This whitepaper offers some important suggestions that if considered and implemented could make a marked difference in the quality and cost effectiveness of planning, design, and construction services for future state funded and supported projects – and in many ways the future of the profession itself. Visit AIACC.org to review the whitepaper.

Robert J. Williamson, AIA
I commend the AIACC for taking on this effort to help identify efficiencies within the operations of the Division of the State Architect. Having worked with DSA on a number of school projects over the past 10 years, I can attest to the superior level of quality that was acheived in the design and construction process thanks to the highly qualified teams of architects and engineers on both the design and DSA teams, but know that the DSA bureaucracy was a source of many unnecessary delays and added costs to my projects. I look forward to ushering in a new era of collaboration.
John Miller
I am looking for something positive to say about the White Paper but so far, I can’t seem to find anything. There needs to be a real discussion of the problems that are besetting DSA not pabulum. For instance, if it takes 6 months for an FCD to be processed, then the system is broken. If it takes a year for a change order to be reviewed, the system is broken. If the answer to understaffing is additional furlough days, the system is broken. If the answer to open positions is a hiring freeze, the system is broken. I could go on, but I think you get the picture.