Noteworthy: Legislative Update

in: AIACC / 2 Comments
legislative, interior design, practice act, court construction, vehicle miles traveled, building code

Share this article:

This article is the first in a regular series about some of the latest developments heard in legislative circles “around town.”

Interior Design Practice Act
So far, this bill has taken the majority of our lobbying time. It is still early in the year, and our time soon will be divided among many issues, including our sponsored bills, but an active coalition has formed in opposition to AB 2482 and is meeting with the author, legislators who sit on the Assembly Business & Professions Committee, where the bill has been assigned, and the Secretary of the State and Consumer Services Agency.

The coalition includes the National Kitchen & Bath Association, the Community College League of California, several community college districts, the California Building Officials, the California Legislative Coalition for Interior Design, Home Depot, Lowes, the California Retail Association, and several other groups.

AB 2482 creates a practice act for interior designers and limits who can engage in this newly defined practice. It would not stop architects from legally engaging in interior design, of course. It is, however, an attempt by a small group of interior designers to use the power of the state to limit who can provide interior design services.

Additionally, for a reason we cannot understand, it places restrictions on who can own an architectural firm and, if an architectural firm has a non-licensed individual as a co-owner, places the architectural firm under the regulatory authority of the proposed Interior Design licensing board.

More to come in the next issue of Relevance.

Court Construction Coalition
Given the continued poor health of the state budget, we are assuming the Legislature and Governor will again look to take money from the court construction fund as they put together a state budget in June (if it happens, it will not be a loan, but a taking that does not have to be repaid).

You may recall that last year’s budget took over $300 million from the court construction fund. This money was to be used to purchase sites and hire design teams. As a result of that taking, two projects were cancelled and the progress on most of the others could be slowed.

An additional raid on this fund would have a devastating impact on the program. We get that, and so do several others who have formed a coalition of design, construction, and labor groups opposed to any additional raids on this fund.

Vehicle Miles Traveled
Legislation has been introduced to require the building code to include standards that reduce vehicle miles traveled by occupants of residential and commercial buildings. This bill warrants serious discussion, such as whether this is a good policy, the building code is the appropriate vehicle (sorry), or should it be in the general plan, and what impact this, and the offsite mitigation requirement, will have on development in California.

That said, some are asking how a new Smog Check or auto mechanic building would comply with this requirement? Or a drive-in theater? Or a car dealership?

This bill needs a lot of work if the Legislature is to determine it is good policy to enact a state law to reduce vehicle miles traveled.


Mark Christian, Hon. AIACC

Mark Christian, Hon. AIACC, is the Director of Legislative Affairs for the AIA California Council, a position he has held since 1999. In this position, Mark is responsible for monitoring the CA State Legislature, identifying bills of interest to the profession, developing and implementing strategies for the positive outcome of legislation of interest to the profession, and representing the profession before the legislature. Prior to joining the AIACC, Mark worked for the State Assembly for nine years in several capacities, including as a policy consultant on several significant environmental laws. He holds a B.A. in Economics from the California State University, Sacramento.

More Posts

Share this article:

  1. avatar
    Mary Ann Downey Interior Design

    Perfect–I agree. I cannot believe thetime I’ve spent on this and I’m not on the front lines.

    For those that think this is Koolaid-read my reply below:
    At 10:48 AM 4/16/2012, Mary Ann Downey Interior Design wrote:

    No, it will not affect an architect’s practice personally. What it will do is affect any design firms WORKING WITH architectural firms that do not employ inside design services. I have worked repeatedly for years w/ architects on large design projects as a team participant, but paid directly by the end user and as such have provided a comprehensive design package for projects.

    This has eliminated the in-house expense of architects providing ID services which from my point of view are typically fairly vanilla UNLESS the firm is quite large and can afford talented designers.

    Since there are a limited amount of designers in the state that have taken the NCIDQ, it would seem that some architects and contractors would have limited access to design participants.


    1002 7th Avenue
    Sacramento, CA 95818
    Ph: 916-443-2509
    Fax: 916-443-3350
    Celebrating 34 Years!

    PS I guess you ARE restricted afterall w/ anyone in your office who may practice ID.!!

  2. Pingback: MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING REDUX PART DEUX REDO | Professional Interior Designer's Blog

  3. avatar
    John Melcher, AIA

    Does the legislature do anything worthwhile? The notion of an interior design practice act is older than God, and will never go away, so what we need is a deterrent. Let’s do a bill that requires the sponsor of any such frivolous legislation — whether within the legislature or not — to pay for the value of all the time that has to be squandered to defeat it. The vehicle miles traveled piece belongs in the same hopper. And while we’re at it, let’s do a bill that makes it a felony to use “takings” to balance the budget. The electeds should be locked up until they figure out how to do a budget the right way, even if it means raising taxes.

2 Responses to Noteworthy: Legislative Update


Leave a Reply

Join the discussion!